Which software practice is focused on measuring performance to improve development processes?

Which software practice is focused on measuring performance to improve development processes?

• A. Idle workers
• B. Use system based software design
• C. Use metrics to manage
• D. Track defects against quality targets

Answer: (C)

Measuring performance to improve development processes is about using metrics to steer how work gets done. By selecting and tracking meaningful measures—such as cycle time, throughput, deployment frequency, and defect rates—you gather objective data on how the process performs. Regularly analyzing this data helps reveal bottlenecks, waste, or variability, so teams can adjust workflows, tools, and practices to boost efficiency and quality. This data‑driven, continuous‑improvement approach is what using metrics to manage is all about. Idle workers point to wasted capacity rather than a measurement‑driven improvement effort. System‑based software design is about a design approach, not the ongoing measurement and management of process performance. Tracking defects against quality targets focuses on QA and defect outcomes, which is important but doesn’t capture the broader practice of using metrics to steer process improvement.

Measuring performance to improve development processes is about using metrics to steer how work gets done. By selecting and tracking meaningful measures—such as cycle time, throughput, deployment frequency, and defect rates—you gather objective data on how the process performs. Regularly analyzing this data helps reveal bottlenecks, waste, or variability, so teams can adjust workflows, tools, and practices to boost efficiency and quality. This data‑driven, continuous‑improvement approach is what using metrics to manage is all about.

Idle workers point to wasted capacity rather than a measurement‑driven improvement effort. System‑based software design is about a design approach, not the ongoing measurement and management of process performance. Tracking defects against quality targets focuses on QA and defect outcomes, which is important but doesn’t capture the broader practice of using metrics to steer process improvement.